TYPEMATCHSEO
Launch

TYPEMATCH.

V2.1

Browse Directory
700
400
PAIRING ID: POD-LOB // ETHOS: SERIF + DISPLAY

Balancing Podkova with Lobster

Build a contrast-first system where Podkova leads and Lobster keeps long-form content legible.

Display Face

Podkova

Weight: 700

Body Face

Lobster

Weight: 400

This pairing is engineered for teams that need a clear hierarchy without sacrificing brand voice. Podkova brings slab, monoline, diagonal energy to hero units, pricing sections, and campaign headlines. Lobster absorbs the heavy lifting for paragraphs, product storytelling, and UI labels with its script, bold, retro texture and dependable rhythm. Together they create a typography stack that scales from high-impact landing pages to dense documentation without retooling your CSS tokens.

Typographic Hierarchy & Scale

H1The Quick Fox
H2The Quick Fox
H3The Quick Fox
PThe quick brown fox jumps over...
Dark Context
Aa

High contrast negative space.

Accent
Gg

Legibility on high-chroma.

Pairing Strategy

Balancing Podkova with Lobster

Build a contrast-first system where Podkova leads and Lobster keeps long-form content legible.

This pairing is engineered for teams that need a clear hierarchy without sacrificing brand voice. Podkova brings slab, monoline, diagonal energy to hero units, pricing sections, and campaign headlines. Lobster absorbs the heavy lifting for paragraphs, product storytelling, and UI labels with its script, bold, retro texture and dependable rhythm. Together they create a typography stack that scales from high-impact landing pages to dense documentation without retooling your CSS tokens.

Podkova thrives as a headline face thanks to its slab, monoline, diagonal qualities. Use weights 700–900 for crisp editorial lockups.
Lobster excels in paragraphs and UI thanks to its script, bold, retro traits. Keep it between weights 400–600 for optimal readability.
Hierarchy guidance: run a 1:1.4 modular scale and reserve Podkova for H1–H3 while Lobster powers captions, body copy, and data tables.

Best-Fit Use Cases

  • High-growth SaaS landing pages that require slab hero statements with trustworthy product copy.
  • Editorial magazines and thought-leadership hubs where Podkova can dramatize pull quotes while Lobster keeps 1,500-word essays skimmable.
  • Conversion funnels or onboarding flows that need Lobster's script voice to balance Podkova's attention-grabbing display.

Accessibility Notes

Maintain a minimum 4.5:1 contrast ratio for Lobster body copy and loosen letter-spacing to 0.01em for uppercase Podkova moments. Pairing different categories demands disciplined color pairing—test both light and dark themes to ensure Lobster does not bloom at small sizes.

CSS Implementation Cheatsheet

:root {
  --tm-header-family: 'Podkova', serif;
  --tm-body-family: 'Lobster', display;
  --tm-header-weight: 700;
  --tm-body-weight: 400;
  --tm-header-tracking: -0.01em;
  --tm-body-tracking: 0em;
}
Heading scale: clamp(2.75rem, 4.5vw, 5.25rem) for H1, clamp(1.5rem, 2.8vw, 3rem) for H2, and keep paragraph size at 1rem–1.125rem with 1.6 line-height.
Component guidance: Buttons inherit Podkova at 700 for momentum, while forms, tables, and footnotes stay on Lobster with 400 weight for predictable kerning.

FAQs

Why does Podkova make sense as the lead font?

Podkova owns the emotional register of this system. Its slab, monoline, diagonal profile helps anchor campaign creative, meaning marketing and product teams can reuse the same voice without reinventing the scale.

Where should Lobster show up?

Lobster is the workhorse. Keep it in paragraphs, long-form editorial, knowledge bases, or anywhere legibility is non-negotiable. Its script, bold, retro qualities reduce fatigue on dense layouts.

Does this pairing support complex localization?

Yes—both families are available on Google Fonts with generous glyph coverage. Test cyrillic/latin accents early, but most Latin-based locales and UI patterns are fully supported.