TYPEMATCHSEO
Launch

TYPEMATCH.

V2.1

Browse Directory
700
400
PAIRING ID: ROB-CED // ETHOS: SANS-SERIF + HANDWRITING

Balancing Roboto with Cedarville Cursive

Build a contrast-first system where Roboto leads and Cedarville Cursive keeps long-form content legible.

Display Face

Roboto

Weight: 700

Body Face

Cedarville Cursive

Weight: 400

This pairing is engineered for teams that need a clear hierarchy without sacrificing brand voice. Roboto brings mechanical, fluid, approachable energy to hero units, pricing sections, and campaign headlines. Cedarville Cursive absorbs the heavy lifting for paragraphs, product storytelling, and UI labels with its messy, authentic, handwritten texture and dependable rhythm. Together they create a typography stack that scales from high-impact landing pages to dense documentation without retooling your CSS tokens.

Typographic Hierarchy & Scale

H1The Quick Fox
H2The Quick Fox
H3The Quick Fox
PThe quick brown fox jumps over...
Dark Context
Aa

High contrast negative space.

Accent
Gg

Legibility on high-chroma.

Pairing Strategy

Balancing Roboto with Cedarville Cursive

Build a contrast-first system where Roboto leads and Cedarville Cursive keeps long-form content legible.

This pairing is engineered for teams that need a clear hierarchy without sacrificing brand voice. Roboto brings mechanical, fluid, approachable energy to hero units, pricing sections, and campaign headlines. Cedarville Cursive absorbs the heavy lifting for paragraphs, product storytelling, and UI labels with its messy, authentic, handwritten texture and dependable rhythm. Together they create a typography stack that scales from high-impact landing pages to dense documentation without retooling your CSS tokens.

Roboto thrives as a headline face thanks to its mechanical, fluid, approachable qualities. Use weights 700–900 for crisp editorial lockups.
Cedarville Cursive excels in paragraphs and UI thanks to its messy, authentic, handwritten traits. Keep it between weights 400–600 for optimal readability.
Hierarchy guidance: run a 1:1.4 modular scale and reserve Roboto for H1–H3 while Cedarville Cursive powers captions, body copy, and data tables.

Best-Fit Use Cases

  • High-growth SaaS landing pages that require mechanical hero statements with trustworthy product copy.
  • Editorial magazines and thought-leadership hubs where Roboto can dramatize pull quotes while Cedarville Cursive keeps 1,500-word essays skimmable.
  • Conversion funnels or onboarding flows that need Cedarville Cursive's messy voice to balance Roboto's attention-grabbing display.

Accessibility Notes

Maintain a minimum 4.5:1 contrast ratio for Cedarville Cursive body copy and loosen letter-spacing to 0.01em for uppercase Roboto moments. Pairing different categories demands disciplined color pairing—test both light and dark themes to ensure Cedarville Cursive does not bloom at small sizes.

CSS Implementation Cheatsheet

:root {
  --tm-header-family: 'Roboto', sans-serif;
  --tm-body-family: 'Cedarville Cursive', handwriting;
  --tm-header-weight: 700;
  --tm-body-weight: 400;
  --tm-header-tracking: -0.01em;
  --tm-body-tracking: 0em;
}
Heading scale: clamp(2.75rem, 4.5vw, 5.25rem) for H1, clamp(1.5rem, 2.8vw, 3rem) for H2, and keep paragraph size at 1rem–1.125rem with 1.6 line-height.
Component guidance: Buttons inherit Roboto at 700 for momentum, while forms, tables, and footnotes stay on Cedarville Cursive with 400 weight for predictable kerning.

FAQs

Why does Roboto make sense as the lead font?

Roboto owns the emotional register of this system. Its mechanical, fluid, approachable profile helps anchor campaign creative, meaning marketing and product teams can reuse the same voice without reinventing the scale.

Where should Cedarville Cursive show up?

Cedarville Cursive is the workhorse. Keep it in paragraphs, long-form editorial, knowledge bases, or anywhere legibility is non-negotiable. Its messy, authentic, handwritten qualities reduce fatigue on dense layouts.

Does this pairing support complex localization?

Yes—both families are available on Google Fonts with generous glyph coverage. Test cyrillic/latin accents early, but most Latin-based locales and UI patterns are fully supported.